For the first time, NCAA athletes have been allowed to unionize. A National Labor Relations Board regional manager ruled on Monday the Dartmouth men’s basketball team could vote to form a union. It would mark the first time a labor union would consist of NCAA athletes.
Here’s what could happen:
From student-athlete to student-employee
In essence, the decision changes the decades-old designation from “student-athlete” to “student-employee”, at least at Dartmouth. That NLRB official decided the players should be compensated because of the labor they provide to the private Hanover, New Hampshire-based school.
As such, Dartmouth players could collectively bargain for salary, working conditions such as practice times and travel arrangements.
Front Office Sports reported Dartmouth will appeal the ruling, setting in motion a process that could take years and lead all the way to the Supreme Court. But for now, it is another blow against the NCAA and its amateurism model.
Vote to join union expected soon
At some point in the near future, the 15 players on the Dartmouth roster will vote to unionize. Only a simple majority of eight is needed for the players to formally ask to join Local 560 of Service Employees Union. That union already represents some employees at Dartmouth.
The players have already indicated a desire to unionize. Sportico reported a vote could come within a month.
“The schools will have to pay the players,” Michael Hsu, a former University of Minnesota regent who instigated the Dartmouth complaint, told CBS Sports. “Minimum wage is what it is, minimum wage. Some players may make only minimum wage. Other ones, there will be a lot of competition over. This gives them a chance to use the athletic director’s budget to pay players.”
Such a vote could lead to a domino effect around the country. Dartmouth is in the Ivy League, a group of private schools who all have similar profiles. They do not offer scholarships and by and large their sports don’t produce revenue. That didn’t matter to the NLRB official who focused on the work the athletes put in.
“[Players] perform work in exchange for compensation,” NLRB regional manager Laura Sacks ruled on Monday.
An historic step
This is the furthest a union movement has progressed. In 2014, the NLRB rejected a unionization attempt by Northwestern football players on the grounds that only some of the school’s athletes on campus would be able to unionize.
In this case, Hsu, has also filed grievances covering all of Big Green athletics.
Hsu, who founded the College Basketball Players association advocacy group, has been a central figure in the push to make college athletes employees. He filed the complaint against USC and the Pac-12 in 2022 saying those players’ employee status was misclassified by using the term “student-athlete.” Hearings continue in that case.
As part of its push to get a federal law regulating NIL, the NCAA wants a provision that prohibits its athletes from being labeled employees. In the 2½ year history of NIL no bill has progressed even to the floor of Congress for discussion.
“[The Dartmouth ruling] is going to force a response [from the NCAA],” Hsu told CBS Sports. “As you know, the NCAA has been really going at it aggressively with Congress trying to get the anti-employee status provisions into some bill. I think they’re at the end of their rope because I think they’re not going to get that from Congress. They’re not in a good position.”
Checks for players could be coming eventually
Monday’s action could create a clearer path to pay for play for NCAA athletes. The emergence of NIL collectives has created a sort of awkward compensation system as those organizations try to lure players to their favorite schools. The Dartmouth situation would eliminate collectives, if implemented nationally, as the schools would be the employer.
Dartmouth players testified during the NLRB hearing they spent more than 40 hours per week on their sport. The NCAA allows only 20. A Pac-12 study in 2015 showed that athletes in that conference spent more than 50 hours per week on their sport.
That information no doubt impacted Sacks’ decision.
Astated that players could be compensated by their schools and be classified as employees.